The breakdown laws are working, and the game looks different for it

Rugby — Global Sports Focus

Written by

in

Six rounds in, the new breakdown interpretations have changed more than the penalty count.

The stated aim of the change was fewer stoppages, and on that narrow metric it has delivered: penalties at the breakdown are down materially, and ball-in-play time is up. But the more interesting effect is where the contest has gone. With the jackal devalued, the defensive opportunity now comes a phase earlier, at the tackle itself.

Where the contest moved

That has shifted selection. Back rows are being picked for their ability to slow the carry rather than to win the ball outright, and the classic openside who specialises in the turnover is a less obvious pick than he was two seasons ago. Several squads have responded by carrying a bigger, more physical flanker who can also play across the back row.

Selection has already changed

It is too early to call the change a success. The attacking side has gained continuity but not, so far, points — scoring is broadly flat, which suggests sides have traded one kind of possession for another rather than converting pressure into scores. The next round of adjustments will be tactical, not legal.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *